Reactions received by graceNpeace
-
Correct me if I am wrong, if I have got this wrong just tell me: Your OP and the response to my post gives me the overwhelming... -
Indeedy!!!
-
So, baptismal regeneration it is then...
-
Oh please, if this is the best you can do then how do you account for this: 1 When He had come down from the mountain, great multitudes...
-
The point is: faith and faith alone! The leper was healed by faith - no quest of obedience required. Similarly, salvation by grace...
-
If Acts 22:16 means exactly what you say it does (that water baptism in and of itself is needed to wash away sins and actually function...
-
Baptism is commanded - just not for salvation.
-
Until you read the rest of the sentence... Not to mention the rest of the New Testament!
-
The sentence is coherent - it is about faith and belief - not baptism! Faith and belief (in Jesus Christ) saves; lack of belief results...
-
So, you are going to insist on trying to build a false doctrine on part of a single sentence... Wow!
-
No, I ignored nothing. What I did do was read the WHOLE sentence, AND, the whole chapter, AND the whole book, AND the rest of the Bible...
-
Wow, you are struggling! The word of God tells us in plenty places that we can be confident of our salvation - that God will be faithful...
-
Frankly your post was full of mixed messages: You state that 'faith' amongst other things does not save and then go on to say that God...
-
Nobody is saved by obedience - ask the Israelites under the Mosaic Covenant! That Covenant was all about obedience - nothing more and...
-
Nobody said that water baptism was not important or not commanded. The issue at hand is what is its role or place in Christianity. Mark...
