Recent content by Slimsumo

I do understand you would place it at 70AD... But once again. Resurrection did not occur then. So it is still applicable and not out of context as 1 Thessalonians 4:15-16 is the resurrection. What possessed you to get into this strange theology? All of Christianity has always viewed the return...

Question about the bold, why isn't this at the Lord's return? The Bible links it to the coming of Jesus: 1 Thessalonians 4:15-16

Your refusal to answer the question answers the question. It is the litmus test, as per the Scriptures: 2 Timothy 2:18 Who concerning the truth have erred, saying that the resurrection is past already; and overthrow the faith of some.

1 Thessalonians 4:15-17 Is it past or not? There will be no fruit in discussing Christian doctrine with a non-Christian. So I must know

I can and I have explained it. This generation meaning the generation that sees all these things listed occuring. You can keep high horsing but Christianity believes Jesus returns and resurrection is future. Even the amillenniallists believe that much!

Wait, you deny that the rapture is future? pre-mid or post? That means you are not a Christian. The rapture IS the resurrection. Same event, same time. Dead in Christ rise first. If you deny the rapture is future you deny the resurrection is future 2000 years plus, yup. Keep mocking it: 2...

No heaven and earth is heaven and earth. Its not an idiom at all to talk about a mosaic age. Revelation 21:1,3 And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea. And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and...

Yup, really easy. You break it too, if you used this type of method for interpreting the Bible you would no longer even preach the gospel. Lets apply the consistent preterist method here: - The great commission was never given to you, it was given to the apostles only, remember as you said...

Easy debate against Don Preston. Light work. The preterist case is very very easy to defeat, both partial and full, they use the same arguments, the only difference is that the partial preterist is inconsistent. The Partial-preterist somehow sees Matthew 24:31 as past, yet 1 Thessalonians...

Now we know where you get all your confusion from. "Pastor Miano". I googled the poor lad and he seems to be a FULL preterist? Is that correct or am I misunderstanding his position? If he is indeed a full preterist he is NOT a Christian and is a heretic. Oh the guy seems to reject water...

And it is a bit unfair to think that Israel has been scattered, yet all the gathering promises refer to the gentiles who have not been scattered? Replacement theology is terrible.

Total confusion. The palestinians are of Ishmael. Everyone knows this, including the muslims themselves.

I agree. But spiritual does not mean never happens. There are lots of symbols in the Bible, like the dreams Joseph had, or the revelation John had, most of the symbols are interpreted within the book themselves.

Yes its clear. No debate, no mystery. The only debate comes from the people who refuse to accept what the Bible teaches for some reason or the other. It has nothing to do with race or racism, it has to do with God being faithful to His word

Yes indeed! Imagine the faith the people before 1948 had who believed it will be fulfilled literally? Goes to show you, no matter how impossible the circumstances may seem, God's word will never return empty, it will accomplish its purpose. Hallelujah