who the heck is Melkizedec? who cares?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
591
113
#61
Melchizedek was king of Salem,which is king of peace,and the priest of the most high God,who blessed Abraham,who Abraham gave a tenth of the spoils of a war he was involved in,tithes,before the Leviticus priesthood.

The Bible says He was without father,without mother,without descent,having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto the Son of God; abideth a priest continually.

Jesus is not Melchizedek incarnate,and Jesus is not Melchizedek at all,but a priest after the order of Melchizedek,or His priestly office,that exceeds the Leviticus priestly office.

Melchizedek is a bodily manifestation of God,for He is without father,or mother,having neither beginning of days,or end of life,but Melchizedek is not a permanent bodily manifestation of God.

Jesus is the only permanent manifestation of God,and the only bodily manifestation of God,born of a woman,and the only begotten Son of God.

Melchizedek was a temporary manifestation of God,a bodily manifestation made from the dust of the earth,which God appeared the same way to Abraham,with two of His angels,on another occasion.
Yes. Melchizadek was a temporary manifestation and a prefigure pointing to CHRIST.
CHRIST, as HIGH PRIEST forever without genealogy (therefore before any earthly order of a priesthood) simply took back what belonged to HIM from the beginning...
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
591
113
#62
See, Badger?

MPAPER34 showed no hesitation in clearly stating that all these "figures" and "shadows" were simply pointing to CHRIST.

In fact, he said it very clearly so men might not be confused as if they should wait for "another one to come"...
 
B

badger58

Guest
#63
All I can promise is that I will walk in love before all men to the best of my ability and to trust the Holy Spirit to lead all that would
come across my threads. I don't know what else to say.
May the love of Christ compel all of us!
Yes, I can see that.
How about this brothers and sisters.
A cross can be seen as an intersection.+
The horizontal line represents the entire timeline of human history.
The vertical line represents the work of God, his plan of salvation.
At the center, we see Jesus crucified with His blood pouring out on the earth.(we are made of earth)
He is then buried in the garden tomb where He lay for 3 days. Then the miracle occurs, for it was not possible
for the grave to hold Him. Hallelujah! The author and finisher of our faith is risen back to the Father and the Holy Spirit.
To be seated in Glory. This is a spectacle that the world can either reject or accept. But we can't ignore it, like it never happened!

Is this not the gospel?
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
591
113
#64
Yes, I can see that.
How about this brothers and sisters.
A cross can be seen as an intersection.+
The horizontal line represents the entire timeline of human history.
The vertical line represents the work of God, his plan of salvation.
At the center, we see Jesus crucified with His blood pouring out on the earth.(we are made of earth)
He is then buried in the garden tomb where He lay for 3 days. Then the miracle occurs, for it was not possible
for the grave to hold Him. Hallelujah! The author and finisher of our faith is risen back to the Father and the Holy Spirit.
To be seated in Glory. This is a spectacle that the world can either reject or accept. But we can't ignore it, like it never happened!

Is this not the gospel?


So who the heck is Melchizadek?
Can a man be baptized into this Melchizadek?
Can this Melchizadek promise any man Eternal Life?
Can this Melchizadek pour out his spirit on a man?
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
591
113
#65
Can you affirm and agree that we are not waiting for any other to come?
 
R

RobbyEarl

Guest
#66
Most scholars agree that Melchizedek was Shem. The son of Noah.
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
591
113
#67
Most scholars agree that Melchizedek was Shem. The son of Noah.
Oh, Okay...

Well then "Melchizadek" had a genealogy after all!
And I guess we should believe these "scholars" who contradict and speak against what GOD really said through HIS WORD?

Sounds like that age old lie rearing its head again...

Did GOD really say?

Are you saying that these "scholars" are better than the writer of the Letter to the Hebrews?
 
B

badger58

Guest
#68
Can you affirm and agree that we are not waiting for any other to come?
I can say that there is no other name given to men by which we must be saved. Does that fit your definition of saving knowledge?
Can I go now?
 
B

badger58

Guest
#69
I can say that there is no other name given to men by which we must be saved. Does that fit your definition of saving knowledge?
Can I go now?
Remember Rom 14:4
GOD'S WORD® Translation
Who are you to criticize someone else's servant? The Lord will determine whether his servant has been successful. The servant will be successful because the Lord makes him successful.
 
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#70
historically speaking melchizedek was most likely a jebusite...a descendant of canaan and probably one of the last believers among the canaanites...

his name is similar to the names of later jebusite kings of jerusalem...such as adonizedek and adonibezek...

more speculatively his lack of genealogy may mean that he was an orphan or a commoner...and he may have gone into exile...which could help account for the shift in jerusalem's prevalent religion after the time of genesis...
 
1

1LonelyKnight

Guest
#71
So who the heck is Melchizadek?
Can a man be baptized into this Melchizadek?
Can this Melchizadek promise any man Eternal Life?
Can this Melchizadek pour out his spirit on a man?
Remember Jesus is referred to as a priest on (of) the Order (model/nature/characteristic) of Melchkzadek. His title of Sar Shalom meaning Prince of Salem and Prince of peace (Shalom transliteratez to Salem) marks one attribute. Whence cometh peace? Absence of an identity view (e.g. lineage, ethnicity, tribe etc. as well as absence of a tie to an organized (as it were) religion. Abraham honored Melchkzadek in going to war with the kings and on return gave a tithe of the spoils of war to him. In return this group of warriors were given bread and wine. In this, Jesus refers to this practice saying 'do this (bread and wine fellowship of new warriors) in remembrance of me' (Melchizadekian order). He references the Order again in saying 'before Abraham I AM'. That is to say, above the warrior is the leader of peace bringing doctrines and practices, above the married (e.g. Abraham) are the unmarried, above the tribal/generational are those ending traditions of man, and etc.

The key then is to see Jesus as an ORDER of priests separate and distinct from Aaron or Levi, just as the Nazarene system was distinct. Qumran Essenes (e.g. John the Baptist), Jerusalem Essenes (e.g. James as priest of Jerusalem) and the Nazarene Essenes (e.g. the Ekklesia even such as Abraham).
Salvation is in the teaching and practice of this system or Order of leaders, Jesus being the author and perfecter, the alpha and omega, the LOGOS (Word of reason) that is from the beginning and that which by all things that are made, are made (John 1:1 vis a vis Gen 1:1) ...
That's a simple overview ... Kept simple by phone keyboard .... Perhaps more later.
 
B

badger58

Guest
#72
Most scholars agree that Melchizedek was Shem. The son of Noah.
I don't get that impression from what I have read. Some do think this, but not most.
 
B

badger58

Guest
#73
I can say that there is no other name given to men by which we must be saved. Does that fit your definition of saving knowledge?
Can I go now?
To Miknik5
I must follow Pauls clear teaching here.

2 Timothy 3:16-17King James Version (KJV)

16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

17 That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.

King James Version (KJV)
Public Domain

You may have to rethink this litmus test that you use. It's unbiblical, and therefore unchristian. Peace!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#74
I don't get that impression from what I have read. Some do think this, but not most.
the 'shem theory' is a wild guess with no scriptural evidence...it originally comes from rabbinic sources who had a tendency to lump biblical personalities together...

similar 'character mergers' in classical rabbinic commentary are the identification of amraphel with nimrod...and the identification of jethro and job and balaam as advisors to the pharaoh who began murdering the israelite male babies...
 
B

badger58

Guest
#75
So who the heck is Melchizadek?
Can a man be baptized into this Melchizadek?
Can this Melchizadek promise any man Eternal Life?
Can this Melchizadek pour out his spirit on a man?
How about these names
Adam
Enoch
Noah
Job
Abraham
Joseph
Moses
David
Salomon
By your reasoning, it is a waist of time to study about anyone except Jesus.
I hope you can see how silly that approach to bible study would be. Please!
 
1

1LonelyKnight

Guest
#76
Comments or insights into this: Wiki says:
In The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church), the largest Latter Day Saint denomination, the Melchizedek priesthood is one of two governing priesthoods, which is typically given as a matter of course to worthy male members 18 years and older. No exact rule exists about how much time a man must be a member first; he may receive this priesthood as soon as local church leaders feel he is prepared. Ordination is based on the recipient's age and worthiness and does not require any specific training or aptitude. A candidate for this ordination is interviewed and often counseled to study the 84th, 107th, and 121st sections of the Doctrine and Covenants to begin to understand the oath and covenant of the priesthood, the covenant a person makes with God when he receives the Melchizedek priesthood. The candidate is also usually asked to stand in a gathering of the members of the church to be publicly accepted as being worthy of ordination. For male Latter-day Saints, receiving the Melchizedek priesthood is considered to be a saving ordinance of the gospel.
wikipedia.org/wiki/Melchizedek_priesthood_(Latter_Day_
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
591
113
#77
I don't get that impression from what I have read. Some do think this, but not most.
Sir I believe it is because Shem and Japheth BOTH did the work of a priest when they understood to "cover their father's nakedness. Something their brother ham did not understand.
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
591
113
#78
How about these names
Adam
Enoch
Noah
Job
Abraham
Joseph
Moses
David
Salomon
By your reasoning, it is a waist of time to study about anyone except Jesus.
I hope you can see how silly that approach to bible study would be. Please!
Can you affirm and agree that we are not waiting for "another" to come?
 
B

badger58

Guest
#79
Sir I believe it is because Shem and Japheth BOTH did the work of a priest when they understood to "cover their father's nakedness. Something their brother ham did not understand.
I don't know what that means???
I guess I'm as dumb as ham. I don't get how this relates to anything I've said.