Search results

I tend to agree with you crossnote... but I don't restrict it to Rome and liberal institutions, but to churchdom in general.

Although that interpretation would be a huge support to what I believe... It need not be so for the body of reasoning I have come to believe scripture teaches.

I have no problem with that idea... and I have entertained an unknown period of time between the rapture and the beginning of the week of Jacobs trouble. Do you believe the Lamb receiving the scroll inaugurates the 7 year period?

Like I said previously, "I believe that the Day of Jesus Christ(Phil 1:6) "The Rapture" inaugurates the 70th week." Before the mystery of the Church or "Christ in us"... There were only two kinds of people on earth... Jews and Gentiles... and God dealt with Israel as a separate people. Since...

Next weekend shall not come, except Friday come first, and we settle into our rooms and walk on the beach and behold the sunsets. And of course... "He" which restrains will be taken out of the way AND THEN SHALL that wicked be revealed. We can't have it both ways...

I believe "He" that letteth or restaineth is the Holy spirit within the body of Christ, The Church... and that She must be removed in order for the Day of the Lord to begin because the week of Jacob's trouble is appointed to Israel apart from the Church in totality. I also agree that post...

I find her animated pronunciation hard to listen to.

I believe that the Day of Jesus Christ(Phil 1:6) "The Rapture" inaugurates the 70th week, the week of Jacob's trouble, or the Day of the Lord... Which incorporates the fulfillment of all promise and prophecy to Israel continuing into the Millennial reign.

T.A. McMahn carries on the work of Dave Hunt who was very close with Chuck Missler and another of my Mentors. This is an interesting piece about a book written over a century ago that reads as contemporary as books written today as to apostacy the framework of deception against Christianity in...

I am also a Jacob Prasch fan... About the only thing I disagree with him on is his teaching of a mid trib rapture.

Reply: 25But that which ye have already hold fast till I come. 26And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations: 27And he shall rule them with a rod of iron; as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to shivers: even as I received of...

Reply: Because you reject distinguishable economies in the outworking of God’s purposes, you reject that just as there is a time of the fullness of the gentiles… so there will be a time of the fullness of mankind when final judgement takes place.

Reply: Hebrews 11:1 Now faith is the [substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. Because you reject distinguishable economies in the outworking of God’s purposes, you reject a time when mankind knows King Jesus, not by faith, but by sight, yet need be ruled by a rod of...

Reply: Isaiah 65: 17For, behold, I create new heavens and a new earth: and the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind. 18But be ye glad and rejoice for ever in that which I create: for, behold, I create Jerusalem a rejoicing, and her people a joy. 19And I will rejoice in Jerusalem...

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ From the verses below, how can one not clearly understand that there is a period of 1000 years appointed to the earth and those upon...

Since Jacob Prasch was thrown into the mix against Servus Christi... You guys should check out a video from him. Keep in mind that he is speaking off the cuff... You may disagree with some peripheral subject having to do with eschatology but the man is a wonderful bible teacher with a great...

Me: Obviously you're not used to it when someone is agreeing with you on a point. You: No, I don't have an issue with someone expressing their opinion. They can disagree with me if they want. Is there a disconnect here?

Obviously you're not used to it when someone is agreeing with you on a point.